Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

DeFi Cheetah - e/acc
Investing @VelocityCap_|prev @BinanceResearch|Disclaimer: No Financial Advice
With more and more stablecoin issuers, @capmoney_'s launch of CSN helps alleviates the issue caused by the heterogeneity of different stablecoins!

cap16.7. klo 23.31
Cap is proud to announce the Cap Stablecoin Network (CSN) with @PayPal USD being our initial launch partner.
The deal marks a watershed moment for the ecosystem as we gear up to launch cUSD, the first stablecoin with credible financial guarantees.
Here's why it matters:

6,86K
It only takes $130M to dictate ALL @Polymarket results. How is it happening? 🧵👇👇
The @Polymarket voting results have been criticised for being prone to manipulation multiple times. This time, a $240M bet was blatantly reversed, leaving all correct bettors with nothing: on June 26, @ZelenskyyUa wore a suit during a meeting with Trump in The Hague. Yet, the final result was shockingly “No.” The manipulation was probably because of @Polymarket’s oracle, @UMAprotocol, whose major stakeholders refused to accept the loss and manipulated the voting outcome.
@UMAprotocol, operating on a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, determines results based solely on the choice of the largest stakers. Thus, major stakeholders can fully control the outcome. And due to UMA’s PoS slashing mechanism, smaller stakers, under pressure from exerted by major players, are forced to vote with them. Otherwise, if their votes don’t “align with the facts,” they face penalties. Can @eigenlayer's intersubjective staking help out this issue?
In fact, UMA’s market cap is only ~$130M, meaning Polymarket’s bets, worth tens or hundreds of billions, rely entirely on this $130M PoS system. This is entirely disproportionate: controlling UMA can essentially dictate the result of @Polymarket, and more improtantly, @UMAprotocol's major stakeholders hold up to 95% of the tokens!

9,18K
Erebor Bank, aimed at filling the void left by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), is backed by chads:
- @peterthiel (self-explanatory)
- @PalmerLuckey: the co-founder of @anduriltech (defense tech) and @oculus (acquired by @Meta)
- Joe Lonsdale: co-founder of Palantir
It will be run by the leadership team:
- @JacobHirshman: former adviser to @circle
- Owen Rapaport: co-founder of Argus (software firm) and CEO of Aer Compliance, with experience in tech & compliance
- Mike Hagedorn: former VP at SVB
It is to cater to high-growth, high-risk sectors that traditional banks often avoid due to regulatory constraints. The name Erebor is inspired by the "Lonely Mountain" from J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, a name consistent with the style of other Tolkien-inspired ventures backed by Thiel (e.g., Palantir, Anduril). The dynamic is getting more interesting here.
1,43K
I can't agree with this more. Simply tokenizing equities isn't hard. Bootstrapping enough liquidity to facilitate the global-scale trading is. Mirror protocol did that before (if you are a DeFi veteran you'll know); @SNX_Exchange did that too way way earlier on. They all failed for one main reason, inter alia: lack of meaningful amount of liquidity.
(Just one small note: I don't think during weekends there is a need of active market makers to maintain the price, unless they think this is the only way of boostrapping liquidity - by the way, this is also why AMM is so powerful: professional MMs are risk-averse and can't be relied on if you would like to bootstrap liquidity of some pairs from ground zero, but AMMs could do a better job.)

Rob Hadick >|<1.7. klo 20.02
I know everyone is really bulled up on the Robinhood announcement and tokenized equities, and not to be a bear, but the conversation seems to lack a lot of nuance. I'm a long term bull but I expect near term expectations are WAY too high. So lets take a critical look.
So, how do these products actually work? Using xStocks as an example (and this looks to be how the HOOD product will approximately work too), you have an SPV out of Jersey that is regulated in Lichtenstein. To mint/redeem you have to be KYC'd with Kraken (and soon other exchanges) and that token gives any holder who KYCs the legal right to redeem for the cash value of their equity token at the OFFCHAIN price (not what it trades at on chain). Dividends are reinvested in kind / token doesn't rebase and voting rights go to the SPV. Once you have the token you can send it to any wallet / use it in defi / etc.
Notably, when you mint the token the SPV then goes and acquires the share as collateral. They can (mostly) only acquire shares during market hours. So all after hours / weekend trading will require a market maker to hold the price risk (which will be very hard or impossible to hedge) until they can mint/redeem - but even then redemption fees are at a quite high (for MM standards) 25bps. It's also true that there is a lot of regulatory risk for any defi protocol and market maker who may end up serving a US user who buys this onchain (far more than your other coins).
This means a few important things, most importantly - Market makers, because they will have to take massive amounts of weekend and after hours price risk, will have to blow out spreads that will make trading these things outside of market hours untenable for most professional traders and firms. Those firms will also, likely, pull liquidity in times of market stress on weekends and after hours. Which, if these things permeate defi lending and derivs, will create major cascading liquidation risk. Also, because you only have legal right to the cash value of the offchain price less 25bps redemption, you will see quick convergence back to the offchain price when equities markets open. That means when people buy in times of that low liquidity euphoria on weekends/after hours but the equities market then opens lower than token buyers expected, you will see quick rapid losses at open which will primarily be born by retail (also potentially gains, but less likely due to sophisticated actors).
Functionally, that means these are just not good products. They absolutely serve a use case in terms of providing access to otherwise underserved markets. That includes crypto native traders who don't want to kyc/aml (for whatever reason) at a brokerage. Also ease of transfer, fractionalized shares and better reconciliation. But only for a small subset of retail. They cannot serve a sophisticated, real, and global equities market. And they likely won't even serve the needs of the professional crypto traders who know they can get significantly better pricing and less risk elsewhere. This will be especially true on the weekends (after hours a bit easier to figure out) and onchain vs. in Cefi.
Long-term, as primary markets come onchain, collateral mobility moves to tokenized products, and traditional takers can fix their (pretty outdated) tech stacks, you'll see equities move in real size onchain and liquidity increase dramatically. There will be lots of headlines, but these existing products are likely going to be a disappointing speed bump in the trajectory we are on.
5,42K
Why can anyone trade tokenized stocks by @xStocksFi, WITHOUT KYC? Perhaps it’s because @BackedFi only allows KYC-ed parties to do the redemption of underlying stocks, and that’s why it’s fine trading tokenized stocks as we don’t have access to the underlying without KYC.
Am I correct @xStocksFi & @BackedFi??
1,13K
One key difference between @krakenfx’s
@xStocksFi and @RobinhoodApp is the price discovery of tokenized stocks. On the former, they are issued as SPL tokens on @Solana. Each @xStocksFi tokenized product is backed 1:1 by actual shares held by @BackedFi, ensuring a direct link to the underlying asset by offering the redemption option, where investors can redeem tokens for the cash equivalent of the underlying securities, which enables arbitrage as traders can buy stock tokens and redeem them for the cash value when the token price falls below the real stock price (significantly), or vice versa.
Comparatively, @RobinhoodApp’s 200 tokenized stocks initially targeting European users. Unlike @krakenfx, Robinhood’s tokenized stocks can only be traded exclusively within their app. It seems that they control the price discovery process by setting prices based on the real stock prices, acting as the intermediary. These tokens, by contrast, can be best described as derivatives tracked on the blockchain that follow traditional stock and ETF prices. Robinhood is likely to use real-time market data to determine buy and sell prices, ensuring they mirror the underlying asset’s value. This centralized approach means price discovery is facilitated by Robinhood’s platform, with trading occurring 24/5, Monday to Friday
5,29K
I just wonder, for both @RobinhoodApp & @krakenfx’s @xStocksFi, are users required to do KYC in order to have access to the tokenized equity trading? If so, what’s the point of only serving existing users who have access? If no, why? What makes it possible to bypass the current legal requirement?
2,14K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit
Ketjussa trendaava
Trendaa X:ssä
Viimeisimmät suosituimmat rahoitukset
Merkittävin