To be honest, I haven’t been fully satisfied with every step @StoryProtocol has taken thus far. I’ve even publicly criticized a few of its past initiatives. Still, as someone who has witnessed Story’s beginnings as a fellow industry builder, I sincerely want to support this new initiative. When building blockchain infrastructure, especially in the early stages, there is often little demand and the tools themselves are not yet mature. Relying solely on “organic community participation” to develop this infrastructure can be both time-consuming and incredibly difficult. That’s why some of the Layer 1 projects I admire most take it upon themselves to build robust infrastructure and layer use cases on top of it directly. For Story, I see @psdnai as that kind of initiative. While I hope that, over time, talented contributors from various backgrounds will join and help build out Story’s infrastructure, I believe that at this stage, it is the Foundation that must proactively lead the charge—laying down the groundwork and driving use case development. Ultimately, for Story Protocol to thrive, it must accumulate data worth licensing. As more valuable data gets onboarded, businesses will be able to build compelling applications on top of it. Everything must tie back to the success of the Story Protocol. Building a new market is never easy, but I hope that—step by step—we can collectively shape a system where contributors are fairly rewarded for sharing data, and enterprises gain access to high-quality datasets. Kinda curious about detailed architecture of it tho. Looking forward to reading about more detail docs!