Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
I want to do the AI thing with the computers.
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 kirjasi uudelleen
Today we're talking about the passage of the GENIUS Act.
The "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act" — which provides clear rules of the road for stablecoins in the U.S. We cover the law's implications, the recent high-stakes vote in the House of Representatives, and the bipartisan efforts to pass this groundbreaking bill.
We also touch on the CLARITY Act — a major new “market structure” bill that would establish a clear regulatory framework for digital asset markets — which the House also passed with bipartisan support and which is now headed to the Senate.
Here to separate the signal from the noise are members of the a16z crypto team who had a front-row seat to the action. We've got @milesjennings, a16z crypto's General Counsel and Head of Policy, plus a16z Government Affairs Partners @BenNapier and Michael Reed, who are responsible for liaising with House Republicans and House Democrats, respectively. They share the inside scoop.
Timestamps:
(0:00) Introduction
(1:01) Understanding the GENIUS Act
(3:56) News Summary: What Happened in the House
(5:45) Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Contention
(7:01) House Vote Drama: Republicans
(9:31) House Vote Drama: Democrats
(14:28) Winners and Losers
(16:01) Decentralized Stablecoins and SEC Involvement
(17:49) CLARITY Act and Future Legislation
(21:47) Looking Ahead
w/ our host @rhhackett 🎙️
58,08K
With GENIUS and CLARITY, the US will lead in crypto/blockchain/web3. 🇺🇸🚀
21.7. klo 21.56
With the GENIUS Act celebration done, builders already want to know what's next.
The answer is CLARITY – crypto market structure legislation – which also got overwhelming bipartisan support in the House last week.
Here's everything you need to get caught up on CLARITY:
171,27K
Do not, under any circumstances, do this. 😆
12.7. klo 00.51
Ask o3 Pro: “Based on everything you know about me, reason + predict what the next 50 years of my life will look like.”
794
“The term "ChatGPT wrapper" is tired and really, really wrong.”
25.6.2025
+1 for "context engineering" over "prompt engineering".
People associate prompts with short task descriptions you'd give an LLM in your day-to-day use. When in every industrial-strength LLM app, context engineering is the delicate art and science of filling the context window with just the right information for the next step. Science because doing this right involves task descriptions and explanations, few shot examples, RAG, related (possibly multimodal) data, tools, state and history, compacting... Too little or of the wrong form and the LLM doesn't have the right context for optimal performance. Too much or too irrelevant and the LLM costs might go up and performance might come down. Doing this well is highly non-trivial. And art because of the guiding intuition around LLM psychology of people spirits.
On top of context engineering itself, an LLM app has to:
- break up problems just right into control flows
- pack the context windows just right
- dispatch calls to LLMs of the right kind and capability
- handle generation-verification UIUX flows
- a lot more - guardrails, security, evals, parallelism, prefetching, ...
So context engineering is just one small piece of an emerging thick layer of non-trivial software that coordinates individual LLM calls (and a lot more) into full LLM apps. The term "ChatGPT wrapper" is tired and really, really wrong.
292,84K
~60% of public companies destroy value. Higher loss rate than top tier venture capital? 👀
23.6.2025
"Only 2% of [public] companies [over the last century] were responsible for more than 90% of the aggregate net wealth creation." Long term public market investing = venture capital investing, whether you like it or not! HT @mjmauboussin
554,37K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit