building a world computer by stacking rollups on rollups is like patching a chest wound with band-aids. crypto need a paradigm shift like @anoma intents, not another L2 that serves no real new purpose.

it's funny: the whole L1 play is to invest in the chain, and you get a piece of all the activity of all its apps. it's funny because, with @anoma, you get a piece of all the activity, on all of the apps, on all of the chains.

When you switch countries, your phone still works. It just shifts to a different provider. Crypto should work the same: use an @anoma app, and you can switch between ETH, SOL, BTC, wherever you want to go.

Everyone wants to make it big in crypto. Get big, though, and you very easily could become James Wynn. Hunted down to get liquidated. This is why serious whales and businesses can't play in crypto: its transparency exposes them to risk. Intents-based architecture like @anoma can provide accountability that what you claim, happened, without revealing your financial decisions to everybody with an internet connection. Underrated use-case, imho.

your AI is going to negotiate with other agents about... - hotel bookings - flight deals - munchies deliveries but you aren't going to want to pay tx fees or sign for every message that's why AI agents need @anoma intents the AIs can negotiate you just sign tx to seal the deal

every ETH L2 is an admission that ethereum's base layer failed. scaling isn't just about faster chains. it's about trading rigid "you must use my chain" architectures toward freeform, chain-fluid models like @anoma.

Anyone saying that end-users won't run their own infra. If they don't run their own infrastructure then they'll never actually benefit from any of the tech we built. They'll just trust a different third party! We better make certain that they run it!

Let @anoma handle the complexity of the entire VC-L1 blockchain industrial complex. So you can go back to doing what you want, when you want, wherever you want, across all chains.

When I was building in the early days of @ethereum, it felt like we were at the edge of a new, cutting-edge frontier. Feeling the same way now about @anoma. Feeling like we're about to change everything, for good.

Despite the propaganda, "based rollups" or "native rollups" do not scale synchronously-composable state on the @ethereum L1: - If the execution trace is determined beforehand, synchronous composability in any useful sense is impossible. - If the execution trace is determined by the L1 validator doing execution, execution is no more scalable than L1 EVM execution is already. If @ethereum seriously wants to scale synchronously composable state on the the L1, @ethereum must go back to execution sharding. There is no alternative. Full arguments in the link 👇