If you don’t want to instantly be discredited as an obvious hack, wouldn’t you at the very least qualify or temper your claims? Like instead of saying Israel’s *primary* strategic goal is to get Americans killed, maybe that’s like 9th down the list of goals? Surely self-preservation must rank higher than “let’s hope some Americans die.” Or instead of saying Churchill is the *chief* villain of WWII, maybe he’s like somewhere in the top 10 of villains but not in the top 5? This seems like a low bar - yet he fails. It’s quite transparent isn’t it