Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
DeepMind got a gold medal at the IMO on Friday afternoon. But they had to wait for marketing to approve the tweet — until Monday.
@OpenAI shared theirs first at 1am on Saturday and stole the spotlight.
In this game, speed > bureaucracy. Miss the moment, lose the narrative.

19.7. klo 06.25
Just 20 minutes ago, the result of 2025 IMO was out.
China ranked No.1 and @GoogleDeepMind won a gold medal 🥇
Future math competitions will be China team vs USA Chinese team vs AI

Clarification: I’ve been told by someone at Google that their IMO results are still being verified. Once that process is complete, they plan to share them officially. Looking forward to seeing their approach.
Clarification: I’ve been told by someone at Google that their IMO results are still being verified internally. Once that’s done, they plan to share them officially—curious to see their approach.
Another source mentioned that the IMO committee asked not to publicly discuss AI involvement within a week after the closing ceremony. Things just got a bit more interesting 🧐
@OpenAI Some updates here

20 tuntia sitten
We might be heading into a plot twist in the OpenAI vs. DeepMind IMO saga.
Just saw a post from Joseph Myers (involved in the Math Olympiad since 1992): the IMO committee reportedly asked AI labs not to publish results until 7 days after the closing ceremony — out of respect for human contestants (see my post yesterday) and likely to allow time for proper verification of AI submissions and formats.
According to Joseph, OpenAI didn’t collaborate with the IMO to test their model, and none of the 91 official IMO coordinators were involved in grading its solutions. Meanwhile, it seems DeepMind is following the rules and patiently waiting their turn.
For context:
The IMO has 6 problems, each worth 7 points. This year’s gold cutoff is 35 points. Even a small deduction could knock OpenAI down to silver. And from my read of their writeups, some parts might raise questions — and possibly cost points.
Terence Tao also pointed out that while the problems stay the same, testing formats matter. A student who wouldn’t get a bronze under standard conditions might strike gold with a modified setup — which raises real questions about what “solving the IMO” means for AI.
Next week might get spicy. Stay tuned.


215,01K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit