This is well said and exactly my response when people ask me about Casa doing this. I am not going to out-shill Casa equity vs the others doing this. More power to them but it’s not in my personality and I’m not interested in doing it, so I would be bad at it. What I am good at is building a product/brand/company that is high trust and that our clients know will always go to bat for them. And building that under the long term mission of maximizing sovereignty and security through self-custody. So that’s what we’ll continue to do. One day we might go public based on having a massive operating business, and that will be part of our long term success story. But going public today just to accumulate bitcoin (no matter how advantageous that is) is ultimately a distraction from the mission and what’s best for our clients.
Alexander Leishman 🇺🇸
Alexander Leishman 🇺🇸17.7. klo 20.32
People keep asking me: why don’t you take @River public and run a leveraged Bitcoin equity playbook? Doing so would be counter to our mission of building the world’s most trusted financial institution. It is not in the interest of River clients for us to go public and distract ourselves simply to raise money to buy Bitcoin. We have a large (and growing) treasury, so we are not capital constrained. Going public can be a valuable tool, but it needs to be done for the right reason: raising capital to scale operations more effectively than can be done in the private markets. If River went public to run a leveraged Bitcoin equity play, my job would change. My number one focus would become convincing the public markets to buy River’s stock to ensure our NAV ratios stay high, instead of focusing on serving our clients. Some people are built to do that, but I have no interest in such things. All I want to do is build the best financial institution our clients have ever seen.
4,03K