The only way Btc wins is if ETH loses That's why maxis act the way they do

The replies to this are funny Try being around Ethereum for a decade now. Every single step of the way, Bitcoiners have tried to destroy Ethereum whenever possible No, not friends, ever

what is Ethereum? to witness the trials of zk pioneers to see defi take DC by storm to watch ETH catch a bid to create governments build on L2s to help unbank your mom to future proof democracy to upgrade citizenship with zkIDs globally *we* are Ethereum

ETH would already be at $10,000 if we just returned to .083 on the ratio Bitcoin maxis and Saylor FUD ETH because they know that ETH is a serious threat to Btc's monetary premium If Btc's monetary premium collapses, it will all accrue to ETH 🚀

Strong disagree Ethereum is and will be a better Bitcoin in every facet of the game I hope Ethereum wins and Bitcoin loses

Honestly it's pretty incredible how many attractive women with the screen name @11iIstjzs5jb0oG want to talk to me

ETH bros, remember the terrible takes and the grave dancing you've posted. Nobody needs you to cheer for them. Certainly not with midcurve takes like this. Rollups expand Ethereums network effects enormously. It's a large part of why it will win. ETHEREUM EVERYWHERE.

This is similar to how I feel about MM. They are squandering their advantage (and Ethereums lead to an extend) by not innovating and holding the whole wallet space back. I'm grateful for their early contributions, but its time to rethink Ethereum and Crypto UX!

I've been at a loss for words for how disingenuous the Government's arguments against Roman Storm have been for a long while now, but this one really takes the cake. In pretrial proceedings, the court clearly ruled that the terms AML and KYC had no place in the trial against Storm, as the Government is no longer alleging that the developer violated federal licensing requirements – and therefore had no obligation to implement KYC/AML. Over the weekend, the Government has now filed a letter to clarify that one of its expert witnesses – Philip Werlau of an AML compliance service – will not be using the words KYC; but that he *will* testify that Storm could have implemented "a 'registry of authorized users' that would allow the service to confirm the identity of people making deposits and withdrawals." Which is literally, word for word, the definition of KYC, as described by the Financial Action Task Force, the IMF, as well as FinCEN itself.

Every day there’s another story highlighting why Pete Buttigieg will never be President. Delaying air traffic updates because you were focused on DEI, transit equity day, multi-racial block parties to qualify for EV charging stations…