Just a picture, posting for aesthetics of it (nothing to see here)

Liquidity crisis which did not happen (thanks to @CurveFinance pools)

Ethereum tps is at ATH while transaction prices are at their lows

They won’t tell you when Ethereum will start scaling, but there will be signs

The Curve ecosystem is gaining: Convex Finance is up 127% (ranked 3rd), while Curve has increased by 59% (14th) for July.

Quick one: their hook is a copy of Curve’s offpeg fee multiplier that Curve developee 5 years ago. It’s simply a parametric change.

🎙️ @newmichwill, Founder, @CurveFinance Michael Egorov built one of DeFi’s most influential stablecoin AMMs, and helped kick off a new era of onchain liquidity. Join him at Stablecoin Summit to explore what’s next for stablecoin infrastructure. 📌 Andaz Singapore 🗓️ 2 Oct

This situation with Resupply caught me off guard. Every project that builds on-with Curve is important to me, and I tend to take everything that happens in our ecosystem quite personally—maybe even too emotionally at times. But my intentions are sincere: I truly want to make DeFi better and more effective. That’s why we not only build ourselves but also encourage other project to build on top of @CurveFinance! Right now, the Resupply team and our ecosystem partners finished re-checking Resupply codebase for similar issues, investigating the attack itself and working on recovery for the affected users. Personally, I feel that while these ecosystem projects aren’t under my direct control and we all operate in a decentralized world, they still have a critical impact—both on Curve itself and on my own reputation. Resupply was audited by some top of the top firms, but it was still exploited. That’s why I believe it would be a good idea to create a dedicated Curve-specific team for auditing community projects. I’d love to hear your thoughts or suggestions on this! Thank you all. I hope to see positive news from the investigation.

Most important part. Do you think that a special Curve-specific team for auditing projects built on top of @CurveFinance is a good idea? Please comment!

Was observing recent attack and resolution process for @ResupplyFi as a bystander. Some takeaways: - Resolution process goes as professionally as it can. Great top-tier team there; - Some people from community made false accusations, especially a bunch of people connected to @OneKeyHQ. Will not tell conspiracy theories I have about that, but at least will avoid ever buying OneKey products; - A bug which made it possible is very unobvious (missed by excellent team and excellent auditors), however could be avoided very simply (seeding markets before they are voted). Seeding ERC4626 vaults before use is a good way to address even unknown bugs of that class! - One should be very paranoid about smart contract code, and even auditors are not a guarantee. Always good to have more audits and more fuzzing. Safety first!