Headliner picks from all client teams: Execution Layer: - Geth: EIP-7928 (Block-level Access Lists) - Reth: EIP-7928 + EIP-7732 (ePBS) + EIP-7805 (FOCIL) stretch - Erigon (both EL + CL): EIP-7928 + EIP-7805 + EIP-7782 (Reduce Block Latency) - Nethermind: EIP-7928 + EIP-7732 and also support EIP-7805 + EIP-7692 - Besu: EIP-7928 + EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch Consensus Layer: - Lighthouse: EIP-7732 (ePBS) - Prysm: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch - Grandine: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch - Lodestar: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch + EIP-7919 Pureth for EL - Teku: EIP-7732 - Nimbus (both CL + EL): EIP-7732 + EIP-7919

⭐️Glamsterdam Headliner Picks from Client Teams Today⭐️ Execution Layer: - Geth: EIP-7928 (Block-level Access Lists) - Reth: EIP-7928 + EIP-7732 (ePBS) + EIP-7805 (FOCIL) stretch - Erigon (both EL + CL): EIP-7928 + EIP-7805 + EIP-7782 (Reduce Block Latency) Consensus Layer: - Lighthouse: EIP-7732 (ePBS) - Prysm: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch - Grandine: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch - Lodestar: EIP-7732 + EIP-7805 stretch + EIP-7919 Pureth for EL Still missing: Teku, Besu, Nethermind and Nimbus This is more exciting than the USA election, wen Polymarket?

ETH deposit queue has been up only since July 7 so took at look at deposit requests from slot 12080022 until now - Total ETH deposited: 844,880.39 ETH - Validators with 0x01 prefix: 25,482 - Validators with 0x02 prefix: 145 - Validators deposited 32 ETH: 22,918 - Validators deposited 2048 ETH: 3 - 1420 validators topped up 1 ETH - Highest validator index now: 2,182,939

Stress-test ePBS (EIP-7732) vs. Electra on 1 GigaGas L1 (avg 200 MGas blocks ~4 s exec) w/ @potuz_eth over 4 epochs: Electra: 28 orphaned blocks (lost rewards) ePBS: 0 orphaned blocks EIP-7732 is a game-changer for Ethereum L1 scaling! 🔥

Analyzing execution data from today -> 5/31 and found 94 blocks w/o a fee recipient (~2-3/day). All validators using mev-boost have fee recipients configured by looking from relayer, pointing to only self building proposer, I wonder what's causing them to miss execution rewards

ePBS 🤝 FOCIL compatibility TL;DR: ePBS and FOCIL are readily compatible, and the clean separation of beacon blocks from execution payloads we get from ePBS helps preserve chain liveness when payloads fail to satisfy IL conditions. 👇

Took a look at the entire Ethereum validator set to calculate how many consolidation opportunities were missed after the Pectra upgrade. Key stats: - Since pectra, 96,672 new validators got activated - 79,547 of those validators could have been consolidated, they reused a pre-pectra withdrawal credential - 14,362 of those validators reused a post-pectra withdrawal credential - This leaves just 2,763 truly “unique” validators! At some point, we have to ask what’s preventing validators from consolidating, is it tooling maturity, confidence time frame, or something else? Happy to help anyone consolidate or talk through it, just DM me

Just proposed a block on BuilderNet and got a highest bid in a long time 🎉

I ran a 36hour study on attestation arrival times on ethereum mainnet (slot 12029000 -> 12039000) to better understand how quickly my local Prysm node sees validated attestations across all subnets. This matters for reorg resistance & evaluating timing slack for slot reconstruction proposals. While similar data exists via Xatu, I wanted a local perspective. Results show fast arrival up to a point, with meaningful delays beyond 66% mark. - 50% of attestations arrive within 1s in most slots - 66% is also usually reached under 1s - 80%+ starts showing a longer tail, with arrivals stretching to 5-6s More there:

Looks like Reth’s db tx insert performance got a big boost too, awesome work!